You are currently viewing Two Reasons Your Lessons Are Falling Apart (And What to Do Instead)

Two Reasons Your Lessons Are Falling Apart (And What to Do Instead)

  • Post author:
  • Post last modified:

Let me guess. You planned what seemed like a great lesson last night. You had your content ready, your resources printed, your learning objectives written on the board. But not even halfway through the lesson, students were off-task, talking over you, and you found yourself raising your voice just to get through the material. Sound familiar?

Here’s the thing I’ve learned after years of mentoring in the classroom: most teachers don’t actually struggle with behavior management—what they really struggle with is lesson structure. And that’s why so many of us are stuck in that constant cycle of redirecting, reminding, and repeating ourselves. The good news? Once you fix the structure, everything else starts to fall into place.

Let’s look at the two biggest lesson design mistakes that lead to management issues.

Problem #1: Lessons Rely Too Much on Extended Explanation

Most teachers teach in what I call “the extended explanation” model. We talk for 15–20 minutes, maybe show a few slides, then send students off to work on something. The problem? We’ve created long, passive stretches where students are expected to just sit and absorb. And when they don’t—when they start chatting, fidgeting, or zoning out—we see it as a behavior problem.

But here’s the truth: it’s not that your students don’t want to learn—they just need to be doing something with the learning. When students aren’t actively processing information, they disengage. And disengaged students turn into management challenges.

Try this instead: Use an Input–Process–Output pattern. 

Teach → Students do something with it (turn and talk, write, solve, or share) → Check understanding → Continue to the next part.

Repeat that cycle several times in a lesson, and you’ll immediately see students stay more focused because they’re part of the process—not just sitting through it.

Problem #2: You’re Skipping Steps (And Kids Are Getting Lost)

Here’s what I see all the time: teachers skip one or more parts of the I Do, We Do, You Do structure—and it throws the whole lesson off balance.

Some teachers skip the I Do step entirely and jump straight into We Do. They assume students can learn the skill by doing it together, but without first seeing what success looks like, students feel confused from the start. They’re guessing at what to do, and that uncertainty leads to frustration.

Other teachers model beautifully but then skip the We Do step and send students off to work too soon. When that happens, students panic. They’re not ready yet, so they start asking 47 questions, looking to their neighbors for help, or giving up altogether.

And then there’s the opposite issue—staying too long in We Do and never getting to You Do. When that happens, students who are ready to fly get restless and disengaged because they’re still being walked through something they already understand.

All three scenarios lead to the same outcome: students get confused, bored, or checked out—and that’s when behavior issues show up.

Use this instead: 

  1. I Do (2–5 minutes): You model and think aloud. Show students exactly what success looks like and talk through your thought process.
  2. We Do (5–10 minutes): Practice together. Use whiteboards, partner sharing, or choral responses. Let students try it with support while you guide and correct. This is where the real learning sticks.
  3. You Do (10–15 minutes): Release them to try it independently. This is where they build confidence and you see who truly understands it.

When you consistently include all three steps, everything changes. Students feel capable instead of confused. They know what’s expected, they’ve had support along the way, and they’re ready to apply what they’ve learned.

In conclusion, when you move away from long, teacher-centered explanations and start using a tighter Input–Process–Output rhythm, everything shifts. Students stay engaged because they’re actively thinking and doing, not just sitting and listening. And when you pair that with a complete I Do, We Do, You Do structure, you give them the clarity and support they need to succeed at every step. You’ll talk less, they’ll think more, and your classroom will run smoother—without the constant reminders and redirections. The best part? You don’t have to reinvent your lessons. You just have to rethink how you deliver them so engagement becomes the default, not the daily struggle.